Section 302 (b) Qatil had taken advantage of the suspect if he had appreciated the evidence. The complainant stated that after the initial investigation, the police had recorded the statement, and the next day the police visited the site of the incident. It cannot be said that the post mortem was inspected the night before the FIR incident, but the prosecution failed to prove any source of light at the time of the incident, due to any animosity between the parties. Did not exist, the prosecution could not prove that the complainant was the real brother of the victim and the other prosecution witness He was the father of the deceased, though he is related to the deceased, but his presence at the scene of the incident could not be proved beyond the shadows. Reasonable suspicion stated that the testimony of the individuals was removed from consideration, and these circumstances were denied 12 bore double recovery e-barrel gun, allegedly identified on the suspect's identity, seeking the report of any ballistic expert. There is no need to speak, which led to suspicion in the retrieval case, and the prosecutor failed to prove his case against the accused beyond any shadow. Charges of reasonable doubt and guilt were set aside, and he was acquitted of his charge, giving him the benefit of the doubt, and in this case he was instructed to vote.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
