The confiscation of a section 514 bond is punishable by a fine of Rs. 300,000 and the accused is present in the court, but at the last stage of the trial, when the case is set to record the defense evidence, the accused himself. Absent from the trial The same day, the court issued a show cause notice for the applicant / bail to appear and bail and explained why bail bonds could not be seized in favor of the state trial court if the accused was found guilty at the next hearing. Separated your case. From the other accomplices and proceedings under Section 141414, CRPC, under the CCPC's provisions, the CCPC must pass the trial court's bid order in which the bail bonds were to be seized. Citing the reasons, the applicant asked the trial court for time to present the accused. For which he was granted bail, but the trial court did not give him such an opportunity, no doubt, the provisions of section 51414, CRPC, were enforced to initiate proceedings against litigation. Refer back to the case of seizure of bail bonds and recovery of fines, but these provisions were not meant to be used as a net for bail when bail attempts were subsequently concluded when the accused was tried by the court. I was presented, where the accused offered an explanation. In his absence, he was abducted by some unknown persons who took him to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The accused surrendered before the court with bail and the trial court arrested the accused and sent him to lockup. In which the bail bail was confirmed the real effort was made, the trial
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
