Article 265F and 493 Evidence 495, the statement of a government lawyer acting under the CCPC cannot be questioned simply because of the admissibility of the documents because the aforesaid documents are referred to in Section 265F, CRPC Were not presented by prosecution under. In the initial phase of the trial, the delay in preparation of the documents, in the circumstances, caused the difference between civil and criminal proceedings in connection with the documentary evidence, when there was no question by the defense of the originality of the document, These documents should not be verified. In the final phase of the trial, refuse to admit the documents with evidence if it is deemed necessary only for the conclusion of the dispute, especially if the defense has the opportunity to reject the said documents by presenting the defense evidence. After admitting the documents, the court had the authority to consider the internal value of the documents to be relied upon.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
