Sections 214, 215, 218 and 226 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 41 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), sections 42 and 54 of the suit, declaration and permanent injunction were claimed by this sale mutation The plaintiff's lawyer was confirmed. In favor of the defendant it was without his permission. The lawyer fraudulently obtained the power of attorney registered with the plaintiff and sold the suit land at a price lower than its purchase price and the lawyer did not pay the sale price of the suit land to the plaintiff's request that This case was not manageable. That he was transferring the suit land in good faith for valuable consideration and that the plaintiff had purchased the suit land through a pre-emption suit, which provided the cost to prevent the pre-sale possession. Just six days after the approval of the plaintiff, the plaintiff revoked the authority of his lawyer. After the alteration and filing of the lawsuit, Lamberdar and the Deputy Tehsildar claimed that the plaintiff's lawyer had received the present value of the suit land from the plaintiff, according to the plaintiff's son's submission, to his father (the plaintiff). Money was needed. If someone needs money, they will be expected to sell their assets even on lesser terms, once a designated attorney is as good as the one mentioned in the off-record attorney's transaction. Shall be appropriate for the purposes which the relevant plaintiff did at the time of his recovery. The plaintiff's plaintiff filed the lawsuit on her own and survived for a year after which the plaintiff freely gave her lawyer the power of attorney, who was legally registered, and cheated.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
