IGNEES MARIA versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, DISTRICT BAHAWALNAGAR
Arts 4, 14, 18 and 1994 Punjab Contract Appointment Policy, 2004 Constitution Petition Applicants were outraged by the selection process for appointment through powers Applicants acknowledged that the appointments were Punjab contracts. Violations raised by the Appointment Policy, 2004 were violated. Authorities said that the unusual irregularities inflicted by applicants and on record were not just minor procedural errors, but were a violation of the basic recruitment scheme, The whole selection process has gone to the root. And such an illegal act cannot be protected under any law. The High Court may affirm a writ, instruction or order in exercise of its discretion as a guardian of fundamental rights. Officials disregarded the methodology provided by the government for recruitment and did not form a recruitment committee. Accordingly, this law created frustration and disgust in the minds of the neglected applicants and came under Article 14 of the Constitution, depriving the candidates of the right, the authorities denied the rights of those with better qualifications and deserving of appointment. Violated the rights of the profession guaranteed by Article 18 of the Law. Constitution calls for intervention by high court to ensure citizens' safety Declared a fundamental rights violation. The same petition is referred to e
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
