Find a Lawyer

FAISAL MEHMOOD versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SHEIKHUPURA

Section 22A & 22B of the Constitution, Article 199 Constitution petition was filed against the FIR applicant and its co-accused applicant sought separate FIR registration in connection with the same incident and The petition was filed before the former Justice of the Peace, but it was he who was removed after relying on the section H report of the applicant's validity for filing an FIR filed by the applicant, it has been revealed. That the defendants were involved in the commission of an unrecognizable offense and were obliged to instruct Justice of Peace Section H. A. One of the respective police stations relied on a police report and had acted illegally to exclude the applicant's petition, without any independent search for registration of FIR Justice of the Peace. Constitutional petition was allowed and Justice. Offense was instructed to make a decision again. Applicant applications filed under Sections 22A and 22B, CR PC under r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• Mst. ROBINA KAUSAR v. State 2012 MLD 754
• Mst. NAZISH KANWAL v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE 2012 MLD 760
• ABDUL SATTAR alias TARA v. HABIB ULLAH 2012 YLR 761
• Ch. MUHAMMAD NAZIR CHEEMA v. MUJAHID SHER DIL, DCO/CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT TASK FORCE, SIALKOT 2012 CLC 764
• Mst. NASREEN BIBI v. State 2012 MLD 770
• IGNEES MARIA v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, DISTRICT BAHAWALNAGAR 2012 PLC(CS) 772
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE, BAHAWALPUR CAMP AT YAZMAN 2012 PCrLJ 776
• SARDAR MUHAMMAD v. State 2012 YLR 778

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

law websites from Mangi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes