Section 2 (c) provides for the court of jurisdiction of the consumer, the service provider, if the customer has a complaint against a manufacturer or service provider, however, resell or rent for any commercial purpose. The recipient was excluded from this. Complainant on the basis of the complaint by the complainant on a monthly basis with the Consumer Group, to pay the same point on a monthly basis, not to the Complainant under the definition of Consumers provided in Section 2 (c) (i) Bring. Section 2 (c) (ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2005 defined the user as a person who received services for consideration, but in the present case, each participant received an equal amount of money and Submitted, there was no added benefit on a monthly basis that could be considered to establish a complainant as a consumer under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act 2005. Look at the facts of this case, and especially section 21 (c) and (d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2005, because no representative of the amount was represented on a particular type, standard or equality of service and Similarly, there was no representation by the collector regarding his expertise, ability or experience of providing the alleged services. Complainant's complaint was outside the jurisdiction of the consumer court. The consumer court's proportional order was dropped.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
