SHER DIL KAMRAN versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN
Article 199 Bahauddin Zakaria University Act (III of 1975), Section 11 A constitutional application to regularize the alternative treatment contract employee / service petitioner, the defendant was a lecturer at the university and suspended the selection board's decision under which he The choice was not made. The advertised post and further claimed that it was his right to regularize his job, the applicants raised questions which were related to the dispute of facts and in his constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court of the Constitutional Jurisdiction of the High Court Can't process. There was nothing substitute for the University Board of Selectmen who could establish any kind of discrimination with the applicant or show any kind of support to the lecturers who were selected by the applicants. Was based on allegations and speculations that were not supported. Any document was withheld from the record Pitterer when he recognized the selection board's qualifications and appeared for the interview, the applicant was admittedly a contract employee and if he was incensed by the selection board's decision If so, he had no right to be temporarily regularized. The constitutional application made available under section 11A of the Bahauddin Zakaria University Act 1975
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
