DR. SITARA ABDUL REHMAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY HEALTH, LAHORE
Article 199 Constitutional application was terminated without charge sheet and the issuance of show cause notice to the employee's civil service services, in a nutshell the law officer of the department stated that the applicant was a contract employee and his employment contract In terms of , His services could be legally terminated on a one-month notice or in return for a one-month salary payment, the law officer's confession was terminated, as the contracting employee also had to comply with the law. Even if an employee was serving the government on a contract, it could not be terminated with a complete disregard of the rules and protection provided to the public servant under the law. The service is accused of corruption and poor performance. Was terminated, the employee had the right to run the affairs according to the law and with proper inquiry the employee should have In the case that was not done, an unknown order was placed aside and the employee was restored to work. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
