Sections 14, 84, 88 and 277 Section RO No 1293 (I) / 2008 Dated 22 12 2008 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Possibility to Object Proposed Assessment of Property Tax on Proposed Review of this Property Tax, Rejection Subsequently, the applicant was directed to file an appeal before the District Magistrate that the District Magistrate's office was not available at the relevant time. Under the Cantonment Act 1924, the determination of the points raised by the District Magistrate / Appellate Authority beyond the jurisdiction and jurisdiction of the District Magistrate was not an appropriate and effective remedy. And that only the High Court has the authority to authorize the matter in accordance with Section 84 of the Cantonment Act, 1924, expressly provided that under the aforesaid Act any inquiry or imposition of tax The appellate district will lie to the magistrate, or similar. The officer may be empowered by the Central Government, according to which, according to 22 12 2008, the Director's Military Land and Cantonment was designated as a term of appellate authority when the office of the District Magistrate was not present, that authority was in the district. Was granted. Therefore, treatment of the judge was always available in the case of an appeal; in addition to the appeal, the remedy was also available under section 88 and amended under section 277 of the Cantonment Act, 1924, when the law provided effective remedy. No one could request. The Constitution's jurisdiction states that applicants claim that the disputed bill has a bond rate, despite the lawyer's request that he agree to the cost of renting the house himself.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
