Section 4040 & and material 94 Option to summon a material witness or inspect persons, preparation of further evidence, petitioner / petitioner filed an application under section 40 under40, CRPC preparing some documents For section 44, read with CRPC, which was dismissed by the trial court complainant. His argument was that the documents were very important and necessary for the decision in this case and the trial court did not properly exercise the jurisdiction he had established and dismissed the application on the grounds that it was not available. It was important for the documents to be displayed. At the relevant time, prove that the party was in possession of the party at the relevant time, where the incident took place, and the trial court could not find any justification to testify that the complainant sought to fill in the account's error or omissions. Especially when there was no restriction on any stage and no such jurisdiction could be imposed. The Chief of the three witnesses was recorded, and is yet to be investigated. And still not all of its evidence can be presented, therefore, it cannot be said that the documents are for the accused / respondents. Will violate rights. A fair decision in this case is essential, therefore, the trial court has passed its injunction without applying the law in its original context, resulting in the complainant during the trial after the trial. The trial court was designated as instructed to allow the submission of documents. Under this
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
