Sections 1, 33, 47 and 79 of the Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008), the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199, 264 and 270 AA repeal of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2006 during the constitutional petition process, mandatory retirement complaint Thirty years ago he joined the company as a sub division clerk, was sentenced to mandatory retirement from the job after issuing a show cause notice and inquiring against him on corruption charges, the employee ordered a mandatory retirement order. Had filed a complaint against him that was an employer accepted by the Labor Court to support the Labor Court decision. Has filed a constitutional petition against the Labor Court's order stating that the verdict is not permanent in law because the Industrial Relations Act, 1 rep, was repealed during the complaint petition. Legislative and without legal jurisdiction was the Industrial Relations Act, 2008, on the basis of section 87, it was repealed on 30 4 2010 and Article 270 AA of the Constitution (6), in the facts and circumstances of the case. Was not implemented because the life of the Industrial Relations Act, 2008 was not mentioned. Article 264 of the Constitution, in section 8787 of the Constitution, shall not apply in this case, and the Industrial Law, Industrial Relations Act, 2008 was not repealed, under the Constitution, or in good faith, but this legal term has not been fulfilled. Was over. Secondly, Article 264 of the Constitution was intended to protect the law, the rights, the obligations and the imposition of penalties in relation to any repealed law. And it does not say that it was before gifting the rules of Punjab Industrial Relations Act 2010
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
