Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 394/412 of obtaining stolen property for voluntarily committing robbery, illegally injuring a crime of robbery, further investigation into the identification parade. Grant that should have been done as soon as possible. ; More than a month after the incident was performed and neither the applicant's role was disclosed in the contents of the FIR nor its characteristics have been described, in the absence of which the parade was identified. He has lost his importance and can hardly be trusted. The accused, who was the main accused, was declared innocent and discharged by the magistrate, the other three co-accused were also declared innocent and released by the magistrate, in such a fact the accused There were serious doubts about the way different people were involved, including the car. Section 505050, was seized under the CRPC and the complainant identified that the accused had no name nor any material available to link him to the offense under Section 121212, PPC. Was, on the record, such a fact was in favor of the accused. The accused was imprisoned from 1-4 2011, his indefinite detention will be of no use to the prosecution unless there is no progress in the trial, in section 497 (2) of the case, CR P.C. The car needed further investigation of his crime, he was admitted after a state arrest warrant.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
