Section 7 (4) of the Complaints Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 406 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Violation of FIR petitioner's cancellation has obtained loan from the complaining bank and for mortgaged assets and properties. In addition to the stock complainant's bank inspection assumptions. The stock, due to its reduction and the applicant, was notified but their complaint was not properly resolved under which section 406, the Contempt of Claims Regulation 1860, accused the wrongdoer of fraudulent stock against the plaintiff. The case was filed, the applicants contended that under Section 7 (4) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Financial Issues) Ordinance, 2001, the only way available to the complaining bank was to decide the matter. For filing a complaint before the Banking Court because under any common law Arden is seeking recourse through any civil or criminal nature. The ban was imposed under the aegis, it could be approved to terminate the FIR without receiving any information that any of the offenses mentioned in the FIR were false and MA was fake and nothing was found. Special offenses were confessed about the crime, which prohibited the registration of the FIR and the confession of cases, under which there were two separate and independent views. The criminal law would have said so specifically if the lawmaker's intention was to prevent the registration of an FIR, and if the law only laid a condition on the solemnity of the law, then to ban it registration. Can never be read Request an FIR
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
