Sections 3 and 6 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 25 and 199 La Roberts Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra-Court of Appeals Aggrieved Person Tax Versus Discrimination Appellant Company was operating a hotel and charging it Rs 200 per vehicle. The notification was furious. Every visit as the toll tax on the road leads exclusively to his hotel was picked up by the authorities that the appellant was not a bothersome person \ The moderate person appealed for a cup of tea. Intends to go to the hotel, will pay twice to think of paying Rs 200 due to toll tax at the time of admission to the hotel, thus taxing has affected the appellant's business even if the actual loss is not to the appellant. Had arrived, however, it was injured appellant was a provocative party because of the functions of the authorities in accordance with the law personally and fairly. Interested in tardiness, the toll can be applied to Roads and Bridges Ordinance, 1962, under Sections 3 and 6 of the West Pakistan Tolls, using bridges and taxing roads while being discriminated against, reasonable and Rational notification is encountered. Serious discrimination against the appellant and the toll tax was generally not imposed on vehicles that use the road and caused tornadoes. Notice of notification imposed on hotel-bound vehicles only, the law allowed taxation due to the use of roads and bridges, but the taxation imposed by the notification was intended and the notification was reported in the matter. Was. Is illegal and liable
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
