Section & un 42 Laws in the Testimony (of 1984 of of), Article Su100 document suits for the collection of rights and declaration of title by the less than thirty years old documents in the suit, property tax records reliance claimant Claimed to be the owner of this property. The trial and the lower appellate court, respectively, recorded the two courts below the property together with the evidence as well as the information obtained under the law gift. The question in question was a document thirty years old and for more than thirty years it was not claimed by the defendants that the defendants had raised a question in connection with the house. The title should not be considered nor was it a valid document or property tax registration is registered from 2002 to 20 years. 10 and these were only relevant for tax collection purposes and unless such registration was based on the work of a title in favor of the claimant whose names were included in the registration of Property Tax I , Such a person could not be declared. Based on the plaintiffs' registration of plaintiffs in the property tax plaintiffs, the property owner did not raise any request in relation to the written action in a written, fraudulent or non-written statement, therefore, by the defendant's legal status. The evidence presented does not have any legal power in the oral dispute or otherwise in the gift decree, in the name of which there were entries in the property tax register, neither filed nor filed any claim in favor of it and Nor did he raise a claim in his favor, the following two courts made the evidence:
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
