Section 188 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 12 and 54 of the contract selling property suits for specific performance, damages and damages The principal and agent principal were responsible for the actions the lawyer made during the currency of the contract. Were In the present case, the agency's agreement between the principal and the agent was intact when the property sale agreement was executed so that the offer of inappropriate influence could not be specifically accepted on this charge only. But the claimant failed to prove that the defendant was superior in the case but rather the defendant. In the event of a compromise when they paid the money, but the possession remained with the appellants and thus the plea of ill influence was only a request and the appellant did not prove that the matter was a verbal agreement in the circumstances, e.g. In this case, it was the duty of the appellants to prove the existence of any verbal agreement. en But it was not signed by the appellants while the respondents successfully proved the sale and payment agreement between the parties, as the trial court's decision interfered with the trial's decision. Was not guaranteed. Discard, in the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
