Article 5, Schedule and Section 17 Laws in this Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 33 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition The suit parties for the recovery of Dwyer in the form of 2 weighed gold jewelry set on January 18, 2004, have disputed their dispute. Agree to quote Accept your decision regarding the designated referee and his oath to be bound by the Family Court, the appointment of the referee by the Family Court, the plaintiff's suit ordered by the Family Court in the decision of the plaintiff by the Family Court on 24 11 2005 Approval of Appointment of Referees by Family Court in Third Party in favor of 18,000 Applicants to the Court of Appeal as to the value of such gold ornaments are set at the request of the Family Court in view of section 17 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, the appointment of a referee on the Family Court due to the 1984 application of the Convention. Could not And that under Article Re 33 of the 1984 evidence, a referee could give only one information, but no decision, and if he made a decision, it would be considered an award and a mediation act. , Will be dealt with under the provisions of 1940. There is no provision in the West Pakistan Family Court Act, 1964, for the purpose of resolving a family dispute, permitting or prohibiting the appointment of a referee family court, by which the parties may submit their objection. Not expressly prohibited or prohibited by law. The absence of any dispute or coherence in terms of obtaining further information through the statutory authorization of the CPC, and the convention evidence, by the Family Court hearing of the referee of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, 1984. In justice
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
