Section 497, Section 5 [[As amended by the Code of Conduct (VIII of 2011)]] Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/148/149 Convicted Emailed Bail, Grant Prison of the accused Was behind bars. For the last two years and two months, the accused demanded adjournment due to non-availability of his lawyer and the case was adjourned for one month; the request of the accused's co-accused was delayed by one month, he said. That cannot be postponed. For the complainant and the accused the accused was not available on the same date of the council, and a motion was granted, which cannot be attributed to the solitary accused, to the accused for trial under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000. Presentation cannot be considered contradictory. The process and the delay, which occurred in the settlement of the relevant request, cannot be considered to be an error by the accused. Because everyone had the right to receive medical treatment from the court as per the law, if the period of one month was removed from the total jail term like a detainee, then the net duration was more than two years. Progress was not made. Formerly the commission was not guilty of a sentence punishable by the end of the trial or a death sentence or a life sentence. He was neither harsh nor frustrated that the complainant and the state prosecutor's lawyer, considering that he was the real suspect in the case, were not sufficient to conclude that the accused was the accused section. Under the 5th provision of 497 was entitled to bail, CCP accused was released on bail
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
