Find a Lawyer

MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN versus MST. BIVI

In sections 13 and 16, the prerogative's son performs in the court of privilege and executes and executes the death of the pre-empire during the trial of his legal heritage, and the son of the deceased pre-emptor as a legal claim He was present with her before the recording of her statement ended her father's detention at the time of her father's performance, thus, she could not be discharged about her performance of such litigation, the plant reported in the pre-emporium The name of the son and his presence at the time of his presence were not mentioned. The victim's statement was contradicted by his deceased father's claim to the son of his ex-son and the right to acquire the property under the pre-emptive right will be born on the date of sale. The sale and inheritance cannot improve their favor of vacating the land because the cause of action had already existed before the Emperor's statement did not show notice to the son. The suit cannot be dismissed under circumstances \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• AYESHA IMPEX v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 PTD 1
• Group Captain Syed MUHAMMAD FAZAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Rawalpindi Cantt. 2012 PLD 7
• Mst. PARVEEN BIBI v. JUSTICE OF PEACE, TEHSIL MAILSI DISTRICT, VEHARI 2012 PCrLJ 8
• UMAR FAROOQ v. State 2012 YLR 10
• AMJAD ALI v. Mst. SAMARA YASMEEN 2012 MLD 14
• ASGHAR ALI v. State 2012 YLR 18
• Ch. NAZIR AHMED v. ALI AHMED 2012 PLD 18
• ABDUL GHAFFAR alias KALO v. State 2012 PCrLJ 21

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

advocates from Chilas lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes