Section 2 302 (b) conviction of convicted AMD evidence, reduction of daylight and the parties knew each other well The accused was immediately named in the listed FIR, which assigned the deceased to specific fatal fire injuries. Affiliation was confirmed in post-mortem. Full attraction was provided to the witness and the eyewitness complainant from the report and the ocular account, the real brother of the deceased was a natural witness, who provided a reasonable and probable cause for his presence at that time and place. Was the nephew of the complainant and the relative of the complainant and the accused Saeed, although a resident of another village at some distance from the scene of the incident, provided a reasonable and probable cause for his presence at the time and place of the incident, As alleged by the complainant, they were fully supported by the prosecution's testimony. His testimony in this regard was in accordance with the prosecution's version, and the collateral account, which has inherent value and intrinsic value, could be safely relied upon after a long scrutiny of the prosecution's witnesses, in favor of the vacancy of defense crimes. No content was removed. Combined with the weapons of the crime recovered from the scene, the medical report from the suspect's video report of the Franz Science Laboratory Ocular Account was fully corroborated and allegations of the murder of the suspects beyond any shadow in the recovery made. There was enough credible material to add that the motive for the incident was revealed in the FIR by the suspect's mouth, in which the accused killed the victim on account of surrounded and family honor such as
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
