The dismissal of the Complaint Record, Sections 200, 202 and 203 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 379, shows that the Complainant filed by the Magistrate under Section 202, CR PC Statements of witness testimony lacks inherent and inherent competence. Since the complainant and his witnesses had made absolutely negligent statements regarding the time and date of the alleged incident, the witnesses were neither trustworthy nor trusted by the trusted complainant for allegedly registering a private complaint. The complaint was filed 6 years after the delay. There is no basis for his dismissal, but in the present case, the complainant's misconduct cannot be ignored because he did not openly approach the court and in such cases the evidence of the prosecution witnesses is not stated. Can be given. The witnesses, who were neither credible nor reliably impressed, wanted the prosecutor to be able to carry out the proceedings under Section 202, CRPC prosecution's story and testimonies. The magistrate correctly weighed the headline evidence and other material on the record submitted by the complainant in which the inappropriate order was passed while passing the illegal order. , Invalid or irregular petition for action is excluded \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
