Contrary to the judgment and order of the trial court, filed by the High Court Practices and Procedure Rules, R7 (xxii) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 96 and 115, section 96 and 115 Appeal. 14 11 1995 was dismissed and the applicant applied for certified copies of the judgment and decree of the trial court on the next day, 15 11 1995. The applicant asked the copying agency to submit a copy on 21 11 1995, and on the said date when the applicant came to pick up the copy, he was informed that the copies had not been prepared. Petitioner continued to visit the copy branch to copy the copy, which was handed over to him on 1996-1996 and the appellant filed his appeal two days later. Receiving copies on 911 1996 The appeal filed by the appellant with a delayed concession, was dismissed, the appellant was notified to submit copies. When the appellant visited the copying agency on that date, he was told that the copies were not made and that no specific extension date was given for the collection of copies. And the officer had a vague statement that he asked the appellant to come three days later, which clearly showed that the applicant had to submit a copy to the Appellate Court on the original date after 21 11 1995. Was not told, in the circumstances, that he had committed an illegal act. The appeal was delayed and the appeal was dismissed because the appellate court's decision below was set aside under time constraints and it is believed that the appeal is still pending as the appeal was not dealt with properly. Was,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
