In section 497 (2) and 87 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 Kital Ahmad Bail, the accused was not named in the FIR bus conductor struck the deceased with a stick, but no prosecution witnesses Was. The statement stated that the accused was a bus conductor. The supplementary statement also does not specifically state that the suspect struck a deadly blow and caused the accident, when the complainant and others stopped the wagon rider. The bus and the quarrel began with the identification parade could not be settled only after the recording of the evidence as it was not a meditation proposal that led to the death of the deceased, not a chemical examiner. Was sent or sent to the forensic science laboratory to determine if it was infected with human blood / hair, if under section 8787 the CPC's name was released without the name, parent and address of the accused. As a case, failure to follow this case can be considered a violation and even otherwise merely a bail. There was no basis for stopping the TT exemption and its meaning needs investigation. Section 497 (2), CRPC bail plea was granted and it was admitted on bail
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
