MUHAMMAD YOUSAF FAROOQI versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
Second amendment to the applicant's name in the list prepared under the Schedule 11EE and the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 of the Fourth Schedule to the Constitutional Petition Act, Fourth Schedule of the Legal Status Counter Terrorism Act, 1997 I was kept On 27 06 2006, and it was required to implement the bond to maintain good conduct for a period of three years, the applicant filed a constitutional petition before the High Court, which directed the applicant on 10 3 2011. Name should be omitted from the fourth schedule. On the 5th of 2011, the applicant was removed from the 4th Schedule of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, but the same day, on 5-5 2011, an order was also issued to the applicants. According to the Scheduled Authority by name again in the list of names added, the applicant's activities were found to be harmful and effective for the restoration of public peace, restoration and the fourth schedule of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 I like the public order and communal harmony for its namespace, but such activities have never been demonstrated and On the record that were made to the applicant's name in the list of the schedule, which lasted five years. And finally the 5 2011 2011 authority was withdrawn, instead of actually removing the applicant's name from the Fourth Schedule, instead resorting to the illegal exercise of adding that name to the list on the schedule. , Under which it could not be approved. In any case, add the applicant's name to the list listed by the authority
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
