Articles 9, 42 and 54 of the Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Articles 8, 21 and 23 filed suit against each other for the possession, declaration and permanent injunction of the competing parties The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff. Had filed. And while identifying the aforementioned claim, defendant filed a claim for declaration and permanent injunction, both competing suits were settled, on appeal of defendant, two persons were nominated for the referee's appointment. And the trial court appointed a referee, who presented his report in compliance with the trial court's trial court's ruling, dismissed the defendants' decision on the basis of the said report and dismissed the defendant's claim and said that the decision was adhered to. The import and the Appellate Court dismissing the appeal, the defendant's order ground was taken by the defendant in the review petition cannot be considered as the referee was appointed with the consent of the parties. And the High Court not only approved the appointment of the referee, but also directed the decision on the fate of the suit, which was decided on the basis of the referee question statement arising out of the suit's lawlessness. And the matter was settled under his orders. An amendment court may not allow reconsideration in the appeal filed against the courts filed against this order, the courts correctly approved the decision and decision as per the referee report available on the record amendment, dismissing them. Was done, under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
