ASMA HAFEEZ versus CITY POLICE OFFICER, GUJRANWALA
Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 212 Constitutional Jurisdiction The High Court was ordered to enforce the decision of the service tribunal in the scope of the civil service service tribunal, powers / applicants. Maxim: The condo lex alvid aliqui recognized visitor and id, sine quo res ipsa esse non non posta The applicant's position was that the service service tribunal had the legal status of the Punjab service tribunal under the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974 (section 5 (2)). Does not have the authority to enforce or enforce its decision. The Act, 1974 declared that the Service Tribunal had all the powers of a civil court when it decided on appeal, meaning the expression was not limited to the decision of any appeal, it was merely a decision. The decision of the service tribunal was implemented by letter and spirit and said that the rule was drawn up in Maxim: es ipsa esse non potest (Whoever grants anything is also considered to give Without the grant itself there is no effect) whenever an item is authorized or worked through an item and it is found impossible to do so. That is, the law will then, with the necessary intention, permit it to do what it needs to do, where a law is interpreted with jurisdiction, and it is hereby assigned to do all such activities Or the power to apply the means necessary to implement it. When the powers conferred under a law can be interpreted as giving jurisdiction to a tribunal, when section 5 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974, the service tribunal
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
