YAHYA KHAN versus DIRECTOR COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS PTCL
Article 199 Constitution Petition for Civil Service Fix Salary The petitioner demanded the separation of the order under which the applicant's salary was refused because he did not meet the requirement to complete the specified course. What was the date of which the 27th was the history of the 27th. 1995, the offer for the applicant as a Lineman (BPS 4) appointment was successfully completed \ LM 1 \ course (three months period), the applicant accepted the offer and joined the post. He then fulfilled the condition of completing the \ LM1 \ course on the nomination by the department, and was not in control of the applicant and failed to disclose his department's course. The applicant was nominated in connection with the training course but refused to do so, the department cannot take the stand that the applicant did not meet the conditions of the letter of appointment, applied in grade BS 8 In the form of an objection raised at the time of the pay fixation in which it was promoted from BS4, the illegal applicant started the required course in the year 2000 and this unwanted order raised the objection that MLM1 Applicant's services will be considered regular at the completion of the M course, was ill and could not be raised in 2010 Rather, the applicant had completed the required work at that time. The employer was a legislative legislature, the High Court had ample authority to exercise its constitutional jurisdiction in the case where a lawyer for an employer committed illegal or material misconduct in relation to the affairs of the Federation. On the lawyer's objection
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
