Find a Lawyer

WASEEM versus STATE

Article 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl e amd The suspension of punishment for legal suspension was not recorded by the High Court despite the expiry of more than two years. What was Present to any former person accused of involvement in any type of case or terrorist case. No significant incident was found to prevent the accused from praying for the assistance sought in favor of the accused, and his case was not entered. Section 26 of 26, any unusual clause in the CR, the sentence of the PC accused was suspended under the circumstances and accordingly he was released on bail.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• State v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2012 PCrLJ 1005
• REHMAT ALI v. Mst. RASHEEDA BIBI 2012 YLR 1006
• MUHAMMAD JAVED IQBAL v. ABDUL LATIF ALVI 2012 CLD 1009
• YAHYA KHAN v. DIRECTOR COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS PTCL 2012 PLC(CS) 1011
• Mst. RABIA BIBI v. MUHAMMAD ANWAR 2012 MLD 1013
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN v. Mst. ANWAR GULZAR 2012 CLD 1014
• SAEED AHMAD v. NIAZ AHMAD 2012 CLC 1015
• Mst. REHANA BIBI v. State 2012 YLR 1017

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

best law firm from Makran lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes