Attempts to commit sections 324/149, 337 F (v) / 149, 353/149 and 148/149 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (c) and 7 (h), civil servants There were two types of cases that led to the terrorist attack, pay for their duties, riot with deadly weapons, one prosecutor gave and the other, in their statements under Section 2342, CR PC. What, such a situation is justified in the light of the evidence brought to the record, and then it is decided which version is closer to the facts and the truth, in the present case the prosecution has found that the Mills case. The role of the Ocular Account exaggerated the contentious and contradictory medical evidence and other circumstances of the case did not substantiate the ocular testimony even though this was not the whole truth, yet it condemned the prosecution case. It was an important event that they could not escape. The wanted culprit, who was not present in the house as per the defense request at the time of the incident, is highly unlikely that the alleged abuser will be evicted from the house, yet the police sealed the area around the house. had gone. The positive reports of weapons and ammunition and the forensic science laboratory at the instance of the accused could not be disclosed in the illegal prosecution case when the evidence of the prosecution was denied after the account was rejected. Regardless of the weakness and ridiculous denial and incompatibility the situation was overcome.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
