BROTHERS SUGAR MILLS LIMITED versus PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD FOR LIQUIDATION
The Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 (4) Constitutional Petition Against the Orders of a Cooperative Judge was the ability to restore applicants that a constitutional petition against a Cooperative Judge's order was enforceable, and that a High Court judge, Under which the jurisdiction is exercised. The Punjab Undesired Co-operative Societies (Conflict) Act, 1993, acted as a personal designator, therefore, a constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution against its order could be filed with competent cooperative judges while it was in Punjab. Use their power under unwanted co-operative societies (conflicts). The Act, 1993, was a personal one and contrary to its orders, a constitutional petition could be maintained where a decision was made by a designee under a particular law, even by a High Court judge. , Had come under the jurisdiction of such a court. Under Article 199 (4) of the Constitution, a person's sense of a nd a proper writ should be available to the affected party. Constitutional requests were in force
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
