KHAWAJA SHAHBAZ AHMED versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, RANGE OFFICE, GUJRANWALA
Section 497 (2) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Sections 2 (37), 3, 6, 7, 22, 23, 33 (2), (5), (6), (8), (11) , (13), (16), 38 and 73 of the Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005), Section 3A bail, the defendant was the sole owner of the steel mills sought on the basis of the grant of further investigation and the charges against him. It was reported that its steel mill supplied its products to various registered / unregistered persons without issuing a sales tax invoice, which caused a tremendous loss to the state exchequer. That the steel mill provided taxable tax to the registered persons but to reduce its production and taxable supply, said that the unregistered persons were provided. That the taxable supply of steel mills was much higher than what the department sales tax was called, and that the defendant was deliberately, knowingly and fraudulently paying low and unpaid cell taxes fine Was suffering from heart disease. That he was falsely involved in this case due to the dishonor of the authorities as the accused and other steel mill owners were suing the sales tax department on various matters. That the prosecution had no material to link the accused to the alleged commission of the crime. It was alleged that authorities had not yet determined the tax liability of the accused, and that no further compelling measures, including the arrest of the accused, could be effected, and it was stated That these offenses cannot fall under the Prohibited Clause of Section 497, Cr. The PC validity accused was alleged to have levied a tax of Rs 133 million on tax and excise duty, but the liabilities of the amount have yet to be determined.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
