Find a Lawyer

SYED KHALID MEHMOOD BUKHARI versus G.M. (HRO) PTCL

Article 199 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited Service Regulations, 1996 Constitution Petitioner Appointed to Apply Showcase Notice Frustrated by Authorities to Issue Showcase Notices and to Eliminate Interdisciplinary Orders such as Charge Sheet / Showcase Notice and Similar Legal Interference Had demanded. Their termination at its inception, unless it is shown without jurisdiction, would be the same as stopping the disciplinary proceedings when the High Court refused to challenge the fine of employees and interfere with the filing of the showcase notice. Applicant had to adopt the appropriate procedure for filing a reply. Submit your response and invite a decision of the disciplinary authority on such application. Was deleted

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• M. IQBAL BUTT v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1350
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2012 CLC 1361
• Khawaja SHAHBAZ AHMED v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, RANGE OFFICE, GUJRANWALA 2012 PTD 1361
• Mst. NAFEES AKHTAR IJAZ v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2012 YLR 1362
• TARIQ MEHMOOD v. State 2012 YLR 1366
• SHARAFAT ALI KHAN v. AKRAM ALI KHAN alias MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN 2012 MLD 1368
• BROTHERS SUGAR MILLS LIMITED v. PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD FOR LIQUIDATION 2012 CLC 1369
• MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1370

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

famous lower court advocate from Kotli lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes