Article 5, Schedule, Articles 10 and 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for the dissolution of marriage based on cruelty on the basis of khula \ dover of section 10 (4) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. The defendant, in his written statement, claimed that the plaintiff was not entitled to dissolve her marriage until she returned the gold jewelry mentioned in the serial number 16 of the marriage contract, which was subjected to it by the Family Court at the time of marriage. Was declared. Returning her Rs. 5,000 as a right seal and jewelry, 13 Tole Appellate Court amended the decision passed by the Family Court and order that the gold jewelry be returned because of the bride's gifts. Was not responsible. An appeal against the dissolution of marriage, which was ordered under section 10 (4) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, was competent in view of the bar in the Sec. On14 (2) (a) of the said act was terminated because the appeal was not filed against the dissolution of the marriage, but it was directed to respond to the defendant on the basis of employment. In order to be considered payable and payable, section 10 (4) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 had its simple and direct meaning. And it cannot be enhanced to include the gifts or benefits of the bridegroom that were received by the wife Dwyer, and other than the bridal gifts or dovetail, the proportional gold jewelry was not in addition to the right seal / strings. And instead of that and the jewelry in serial number 16 of the marriage question was not made a part of the indoor gold jewelry, they were the bride's gifts not to be confused with the Dover.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
