Section 2 (b (b)) Definition of evidence Benefits of doubt The benefit of the complaint has been stated in the FIR by the complainant, the incident which did not encourage trust was neither the residence of the witnesses nor the place of business. The reason given by them was because of their presence. The location of the incident was neither natural nor the possible place from which the blood-stained land was seized and the accused's lawyer was not mentioned. The arguments were not mentioned that the FIR was lodged after the Inquisitr report was prepared, it looked correct, as the story and inquiry given in the FIR The ST report had a completely different statement from both witnesses, it cannot be believed that the date of the knife recovery was taken in writing, with the fact that the serologist's report was not available on record. To show that the blood-stained human was actually a burglary, the prosecution had no benefit in the circumstances. The prosecution's case remains uncertain. The uncertain facts and circumstances of the case have led to doubt in the prosecution case. Were created And it was a well-established and universally recognized principle of law that convictions should be based on essential evidence and conviction of guilt. And any suspicion arising in the case of the prosecution must be resolved in favor of the prosecution, as it has, beyond any doubt, failed to prove its case against the accused, the subsequent decision was set aside and The accused was acquitted of the charge giving the benefit of the doubt and ordered to be released in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
