Section 2 (2 (b) / Q 34) The conviction of testimony testimony, their relationship with the deceased of the witnesses to the benefit of the doubt was not sufficient to refute their testimony at the shop near the complainant's mansion. And the presence of witnesses at the scene of the incident was natural, which clearly explained their conviction that the growing trend of the public was due to the absence of independent witnesses during the investigation. But neither the prosecution can be charged nor any negative indication can be made against him. The role of the two accused was fully supported - the registration of the FIR through medical evidence and the post-mortem examination of the two victims did not result in any serious delay. The case of the missing accused was quite different. And the pistol used in the commission of the crime proved to be sufficiently convincing against the recovery of the fatal accused, under the guise of the accused, even though the above evidence was sufficient to prove the case against any of the accused. Apart from suspicion, the conviction of the accused was maintained according to which the recovery of the weapons of crime was also non-existent. The accused was shot dead by both the accused, but the record did not reveal which of the accused was dead, behind the bars of the jail since 1997 and faced trial. The accused was entitled to take advantage of the doubt by deciding the amount of punishment. On two occasions each of the accused was converted to life imprisonment, with the two convictions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
