Find a Lawyer

PAK ASIA CNG-2, FILING STATION THROUGH AHMAD DAWOOD SOLE PROPRIETOR versus SNGP LINES THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR

Retaining the ability to retain the legal status of a revised ad interim order on Sections 115 and A. XXXIX Rr 1 and 2 Revision Scope The applicant questions the legality of an ad interim order under the High Court's jurisdiction Was raised, which cannot be said to be a deciding matter. In section 115, the CPC revision was excluded

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• ZIA ULLAH v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1232
• MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT v. State 2012 YLR 1233
• SHABBIR AHMED v. KIRAN KHURSHEED 2012 CLC 1236
• ABDUL RASHID v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1238
• GHULAM SARWAR v. VICE-CHANCELLOR, KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, LAHORE 2012 MLD 1243
• KASHIF MANZOOR v. ABDUL MAJEED 2012 YLR 1246
• Hafiz ABDUL REHMAN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1249
• HASHIM KHAN v. Sh. JAWAD WADOOD 2012 MLD 1249

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

famous lower court advocate from Naukundi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes