The Section 115 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 181 Amendment, the revocation of the boundary amendment filed by the petitioner, was dismissed on 209 2004 for illegal prosecution and an application for reinstatement was made. In the three years provided under Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, nothing was mentioned about this lawyer, who was representing the applicants. The applicants did not mention that their lawyer did not inform them. Or they were not in touch with their lawyer, refusing to reschedule the review request. The matter was past and closed, since both sides acknowledged that in the light of the final decree, the possession was handed over to the shareholders. Was excluded, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
