Section 302/324/186/353/148/149 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Qatal Amad, assault or criminal force for obstructing a public servant from performing public service, restraining public employment Completion of duties, confrontation, common purpose and definition of evidence from the Terrorism Act. The prosecution's case is based on the evidence of police officers who were members of the raiding party. They all agreed and supported each other's statements. There was no enmity or enmity with his accused and he confirmed to each other that he was arrested on the spot with 12 bore guns, in which a person was mentioned to collect empty money in cartridge. Was trapped, but the truth of these witnesses will not be affected. All said that the prosecution's witnesses described the events as natural and straightforward, in addition to minor differences, which over time resulted in no material contradiction or contradiction in their statements. His conviction proved with impressive and convincing evidence that the suspect opened fire with a 12-bore gun, which came to the victim's chest and the suspect was arrested on the spot with a gun, with a cartridge containing five Ricky was also the suspect who confronted him. The trial court acquitted the accused along with the accused, but none of them was armed with 12 bore guns and the three were not arrested on the spot. Prove the guilt of the accused, since which was not enough to convict the accomplices. Evidence worthy of acquittal has proved that the accused had killed the police officer Qatiel Ahmed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
