Section 666 Definition of rape testimony = Benefit of doubt The effect of the suspect affected person against the accused (appellant) was that he committed adultery with the victim while the co-accused stood with the defendant, accusing him of accuracy. The incident took place when the victim was 13 years old. / 14 years and at the time of her statement she was fully grown and matured, aged 14/15. Victim did not state the year of the incident and did not describe the time elapsed between the incident and the statement that Victoria made in her cross-examination that she was making this statement at the request of her father Victim. An affidavit was submitted that the doctor stated at the time of the incident that the victim had been sexually assaulted several times and that it had not been alleged that prior to the incident. The accused had committed adultery with Victim earlier, on the contrary, apparently he was a suspicious character and his lonely statement was not in line with his area. It was not enough to prove the alleged sexual intercourse from which the girl was allegedly removed, a densely populated area with houses on both sides of the street, so it is not possible to remove her from the area in broad daylight. Could be done. Victim's father admitted in his cross-examination that he had received money from a co-accused, which showed that the case had been registered. The withdrawal of money was not without weight. There were reasonable doubts as the appeal against the accuracy of the prosecution case was accepted and the conviction and sentence of the accused were set aside. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
