BABAR ALI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA
Article 21 and 22 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petitioner (applicant), guaranteed the orders of the courts below, whereby the application for leave of appeal was rejected and orders for exclusion were granted. The tenant's assertion was that the required provisions of the law were not followed. The requirements of the credit tribunal were not complied with in the legal terms provided no notice was issued by the courier service and the necessary copy of the notice along with the copy of the application and the documents attached thereto. Was not complied with. In order to seek the remedial provisions, the rent tribunal was required to issue a notice under Section 21 (i) of the Punjab Rented Premises Ordinance, 2007, such notice could be issued only after scrutiny of this application and after its satisfaction. It was as though he had been with her. The required documents, if there is no cause for failure of the tribunal to proceed accordingly, are not available to the tenant for submission to the Rent Tribunal and to contest an election for leave under section 21 of the Ordinance High Court. In order to begin the ten-day period for filing a petition, in the circumstances, setting aside the orders of the lower courts and dismissing the request for removal of the land. The Lord Constitution application was allowed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
