TOWN COMMITTEE, DEPALPUR THROUGH TEHSIL NAZIM DEPALPUR, DISTRICT OKARA versus MST. AMTUL HAMEED
OII, Rr 2, 11, O II, R 2 and Section 11 Suit Res Judiciary for Recovery of Amount, Applicable Rule Prior to this, the plaintiff dismissed the permanent injunction against the plaintiff in respect of the same property. Had filed a lawsuit. In which he acknowledged that the building materials contained on the site should not have been removed by Town Committee officials. And no relief was sought for recovery of damages, claiming that in the present case, the plaintiffs are obliged to permanently dismiss the entire story of the earlier case for dismissal, as in the case mentioned in VII, R 11. , Was rejected under CPC, in which the same facts are stated. In the order of the trial, the court had finalized the case as no further appeal was filed against the plaintiffs whose evidence on the order record showed that the claimant's alleged damages were exaggerated. And they were not entitled to the amount as claimed before the plaintiffs were denied claims of exorbitant amounts from the Town Committee as claimed in the present suit filed by the plaintiffs. Had come under the CPC Judiciary, under the Judiciary principle of race judiciary while also trying to see whether the plaintiff's The matters to be considered were or not to be sustained in this case and the point of the race Judeta for this matter could not be ascertained / how much the loss would have been suffered by the plaintiff. The defendants who gave the impression that the whole story is a false, fabricated and lousy suit, in the circumstances, O II, R 2, CPC
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
