MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, BAHAWALPUR
Article 5, Schedule and Section 7 (2) Rules of the West Pakistan Family Courts, 1965, R6 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for marriage, rehabilitation and rehabilitation of marital articles, jurisdiction, territorial jurisdiction. After the trial court's dismissal by the trial court, the defendant filed a constitutional petition against the dismissed plaintiff that the plaintiff belongs to the district and the marriage is serious in that district. The suit was decided by the plaintiff in the district \ B filed. Despite raising objections to B \ B's territorial jurisdiction in the court, the defendant himself admitted that the trial court had decided by the plaintiff to dissolve the marriage and recover the care allowance. And he raised no objection to the court's territorial jurisdiction. The latest objection to the jurisdiction of the same court to prosecute for the recovery of the articles of the dowry, by any of the defendants, was powerless. Defendant's objection to the territorial jurisdiction of the Family Court rightly rejected The jurisdiction existed because there was no case for any constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court by the plaintiff of a family weakness or illegal exercise, the application was dismissed, the circumstances were dismissed. I \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
