CHAKWAL TEXTILES MILLS LIMITED, RAWALPINDI ROAD CHAKWAL versus DIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY, RAWALPINDI
Sections 3, 23, 57, 58 and 64 of the Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Delay in retaining the petition Petition challenging the notice to the applicants / mills as an increase in the demand for notice of payment of social security contributions. , Under which the defendant / director was demanding money under Social Security, the actual amount of social protection contribution as payment for the titles was paid late notice which states that The amount stated was estimated in a case that could be finalized, if the applicant does not oppose it, But instead of competing with the applicant, the constitutional petition was also filed, under which the High Court had stopped, the provincial employees could not make any final decision through the Social Protection Ordinance, 1965, provided that the Social Protection Scheme. Has been introduced to provide benefits. In the case of certain employees or their dependents, etc., etc., and that they contributed to the employer for the same purpose, according to the circumstances, the notice was issued by the director to the institution legally and legally, and According to section 23 of the Provincial Employees Social Security Ordinance, 1965, nothing was found under this order. The social security contribution should be fined up to 50% of the original amount paid for the delayed payment when the applicant himself admitted that the contribution was made late, he had to prove it. That it was not based on financial matters or if the applicant had already succeeded in satisfying the will,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
