When section 302 (b) Qatil Am appreciated the evidence, the matter was immediately conveyed to the police complainant who was the accused's real brother, but there was no immediate witness to the incident, but the mother of both the complainant and the accused stated. Is. The accused's mother, who was a star witness, was a prisoner at the house where the incident occurred. The prosecution witnesses saw the accused coming out of the house, where the incident occurred, in his hand were the star witness and other prosecution witnesses who were nearby. Whether the accused and the complainant were related or the accused's family had no enmity with the accused on the basis of their false implications, the ocular account was fully endorsed by medical evidence that the extent of the injury to the deceased ocular account. Taka's recovery was further confirmed in the incident. Chemical Examiner and serologist accused and positive information. It was not material to mention the motive of the incident, which was charged by the accused's lawyer and covered by Section 2302 (c), PPC, Section 234 Cr, CRP. In his statement recorded under C, the accused did not take him or else, no one could be licensed to kill. The innocent person on the basis of so-called \ surrounded innocence did not cover the case of the accused under section 2302 (c); PPC prosecution had, without any doubt, proved its case completely against the accused. Had acted brutally and in a cruel way, in this case no shortage of circumstances. The accused killed his real sister with fourteen wounds on his body. He did not deserve any kind of relaxation in the killing
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
