Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/109/148/149 Qutel Amad, a burglary with dangerous, deadly weapons, further accused against the accused was alleged that he also co-accused. It was at the time of the death of the accused that he was shot that he was involved in the case because of enmity. That the post-mortem report defrauded the ocular account, and that there was no basis for merely bailing him out, the contents of the FIR revealed that the accused had a weapon and was on his back. Used to fire straight. The victim who was passing away, while the deceased's post-mortem report shows that he had not received any injuries to the back fire, but there was an injury to the exit. The accused alone contributed to the fatal injury was done. The investigation was brought to the record that the co-accused fired on the deceased. Medical evidence was not contradictory to the school account and the police opinion / investigation was in favor of the accused, who added the current case to the investigation. The involvement of the accused fugitive reflects the role of an accused but was not made a crime under the Constitutional Code; in 1860 the application for a charge of bail was accepted and he was admitted on bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
