Articles 75 75, Constitution 76 and Article 77 Constitution of Pakistan, Article Constitution 199 Constitution Suit for the specific performance of the constitutional contract document, Proof of Secondary Dairy Proof which is requested by the principal plaintiff / applicant for confirmation of secondary evidence Claimed that the possession of the respondents / defendants; the plaintiff / applicant was simultaneously dismissed because the sale agreement was with the defendants / defendants. The plaintiff / applicant had no way to prove anything except the preparation of the photostat copy of the law and the registration of the applicant's author by the testimony of the 76th of the Law, of 1984 under Article 76 of Article Article Under this, secondary evidence pertaining to the document may be included if the original person against whom the document was sought to prove the document was shown in possession or in power or was told that such condition was permissible. That the document was in the possession of the person against whom it was. Attempts to prove and that such person failed to present the same despite the notice under Article 77 of the Martyrdom, P 1984 PP applicant / plaintiff mentioned in the Plaintiff that the original document was submitted But did not mention that the respondents / respondents had the document, or that the defendants / respondents had taken it, as claimed in the petition, that they sought guidance. Do The Secondary Evidence Plaintiff / Applicant clearly stated that the said document is in its possession and authority and will present the same claim of the applicant in which the said document was filed by the respondent.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
