Section 97 / / / ?? / / 302/242424 / Cri34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 Contempt of the Prosecution The Right to Self-Defense Until the Death of Appealing Evidence of Joint Intent Against Success Was. Even if it was admitted that the accused and the accomplices had acted in self-defense, it is clear on the record that they had crossed such defenses with the death of the accused, the defense party of accuracy. It explicitly claimed that the defendant and the injured prosecutor were witnesses, therefore, in spite of disarming the aforesaid witness by the co-accused, the accused and the co-accused were in serious danger of death or serious injury. Concerns remain, to the conclusion that the defendant and the co-accused exceeded the right to self-defense, in the circumstances, would not be fair to the defendant's medico-legal report The writ states that he sustained five firearms injuries, but is said to have been heartbroken by the prosecution at the FLR, which raised serious doubts in the prosecution's story and at the time of the incident and the incident. The presence of the accused on the spot, in fact, became very suspicious, so at the time of his alleged incident, the co-accused was identified as seventeen (70) years of age and no incident had occurred since then, Except for its mere presence at this time and place. Its false implications cannot be ruled out, no motive was charged against the witness of the deceased and the injured prosecutor, who was specifically charged by the complainant for any motive. Was not prepared under which the trial was also made suspicious
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
