Section 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) Qatil-Um, the joint-appeal appeal against the evidence's evidence was the charge against the accused and the accused (defendants), who came to court. The complainant's house and his excuse went with his son (the deceased) that they had to take him somewhere for some work, but they later killed him. The alleged motive was that the suspect was suspected. It was believed that the deceased had illicit relations with him. The complainant's sister was of the view that an ocular account was supported by medical evidence and a crime weapon, which was recovered from her home on the report of the accused, and the investigating officer recovered the cartridge from the scene of the incident. ? The evidence for the last case of the prosecution's case related to a weapon recovered from the suspect was attached to the final evidence, stating that two years before the incident, the accused's home was called "Panchayat" in which the prosecutor, in addition to himself. Some witnesses also participated, however, the prosecution's witnesses did not say anything while they were in the witness room. In relation to any `holding or participation of a panchayat 'this word has not been set up or any witness has been set up for the alleged motives of the Independent Panchayat in relation to the alleged motives by the prosecution. Was. In the circumstances when the complainant allows his son (deceased) to accompany his foes at night so that he can go to a remote place unknown for some part of the work, the testimony of the two main prosecution witnesses I was strongly skeptical of the discrepancies in the material. The complainant's house was present when one of them was found
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
