Section 2 302 (b) of the definition of power exploiting the doubts, contradictions / improvements found in the statements made by the complainant and thereby the names of the accused and his accomplices before the trial court. Was mentioned in the site plan. Whereas, the name of the silently acquitted accused was similar to that of other eyewitnesses who had improved their investigation, the prosecution did not succeed in proving the accused, as F.L. In the RFIR, the complainant alleged that the accused resorted to shootings. And according to a post-mortem report, nine firearms were found on the victim, but no crime was found - no chance was left blank. And the report of the Franz Science Laboratory only had the effect that the pistol was in working condition, the prosecution had no benefit to recover the pistol from the accused, in which case the accused could not be considered a felony. In order to maintain the conviction of the evidence can only be based on irrefutable evidence and conviction of guilt and any doubt arising in the case of the prosecution has to be resolved in favor of the accused, the prosecution will, without any doubt, Failure to prove the case was set aside and the accused acquitted of the murder charge giving the benefit of the doubt Was released and released, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
